Personal Productivity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people wanting to improve their personal productivity. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

So like probably many I use Google Reader to manage, read, filter my subscribed rss feeds. Subscribing only as much feeds as you can read doesnt really work. From time to time i delete some feeds, but it still gets more. Same with academic publications - more publishing people - more redundancy.

So the question imho is more, how do I find or better get notice of important rss articles? Articles for example with many comments on a newspaper inidicating a important, funny,... information. How do i find news in feeds im actually seeking for (keywords, topics).

Google Reader offers the sort by magic feature to sort the articles of a feed based on previous rated articles of you (done by like & star button in Google Reader). But despite i rated alot articles, the sorting doesn't look very different from normal chronological order. So this doesn't work well (maybe my subscribed topics are too broad or i have too many feeds, i dunno)

What options does one have to improve this, I'm even considering switching form Google Reader to another software with better filtering, noticing, sorting options.

News aggregator sites like with inherent social rating system i already use. Maybe a option just to switch for mass media information/world news to such services and only use RSS Reader for very specific feeds and authors? Im unsure...

share|improve this question

10 Answers 10

up vote 11 down vote accepted

I had the same problem as you and here's how I solved my problem. Bear in mind that while this worked for me, it's not a "one size fits all" situation.

Clean your subscriptions

  • removed most of my feeds
  • kept the ones from authors with really great content, which I read 90% of the time
  • kept work-related feeds (security updates, partners feeds, competitors feeds, etc) - I'm thinking of moving this to a separate account

Get curated sources

  • follow the relevant people in your fields of interest on Twitter. Even if you subscribe to their blog or similar, they will certainly share content of your interest, effectively curating content for you even if it's not their own
  • use a tool like Cadmus for seeing what content from your timeline (i.e. the people you follow) was most active (retweets, etc) - those are what you are looking for, mostly.
  • search for relevant digests of content. For instance, I'm into startups and found StartupDigest to be a great way of keeping up with news on several related topics - they send weekly newsletters on a fixed day, with links to relevant content from that week.

As a final note, this is obviously not the best way to discover "hidden pearls" of content, but it's a time-effective way of keeping up with great content.

share|improve this answer
Also, an interesting (quick) explanation of why to move to the curated content, by Filipe Carrera (he's a great speaker on this). – tomeduarte Aug 2 '11 at 14:16
Seconding curated content. – weronika Aug 22 '11 at 1:11

It's very simple.

Never, EVER close your RSS client without marking all as read.

So, you either open everything up in new windows, instapaper what you really wanna read or you don't open up your RSS client at all.

This encourages discipline in estimating time available and drilling down to what you should effectively spend your time on.

It's a trick I started using with google reader a year ago and it's never failed me.

Kind of like the idea of never leaving your inbox with anything in it.

share|improve this answer
I like this idea. However, I have over 50 RSS feeds in my G-Reader, organised into sub folders. Once i have read the ones i like the look of, how can I easily mark EVERYTHING as read? – Simon Aug 6 '11 at 0:16
@Simon: there's an "All Items"-section in the pane where "Home" and "Trends" is, there you can mark items from all folders as read – vstm Aug 6 '11 at 7:48
In G-Reader, I like to click on the item and then use the keyboard shortcut "j" and "k" (next and previous) – Atif Apr 13 '12 at 5:41

Cleaning out any feeds with a low signal-to-noise ratio and relying more heavily on curated sources is excellent advice that should reduce the number of feed items overall and decrease the volume of uninteresting content.

Given that you've done all of that, the remaining improvements are going to be in workflow and how you interact with your reader. My over-arching philosophy is that I process my RSS feed items similarly to how I process email. The options are different (e.g. I respond to lots of email, but feeds, not so much), but the concept of processing an item once and decided what it means to you are common.

I also use Google reader and my basic workflow is simple.

  1. Most of my processing is done in the Reader web app on my iPhone. I like this option because it allows me to process feed items in any idle moment: while standing next to the microwave waiting for lunch to warm up, while in a line, while waiting for a meeting to start, etc.
  2. I stay in the "all items" feed and scan the titles. My nosiest feed is Slashdot and 70 percent of the items never get expanded beyond the title.
  3. If something is interesting then I expand it for additional reading. If it's short and the whole post is right there in Reader I may finish it right then. Daring Fireball is a great example of a feed with lots of small updates.
  4. If the post is long, contains links I want to follow up on later, includes non iPhone friendly content like flash, or if the full post requires me to go to a separate page, then I star the item and move on.
  5. When I get to the bottom of the screen, I tap "mark these items as read", which does exactly that and then refreshes the feed, loading the next 15 unread items.
  6. I keep doing this until I'm done processing or bored with it.
  7. Then when I'm in a reading mood I switch to my starred items and read in more depth (at a computer if need be), clearing the star when I'm done.

So I basically use my all feeds list as unprocessed items and my starred list as a place to store future reading material and feed items that I haven't extracted everything I want from yet.

Most of my feeds are pretty quiet on the weekends, so any backlog that builds up during the week typically gets cleared by then.

About once a week I cull through the starred items list and clean out anything that was interesting at the time but that I'm no longer interested in.

Now if Google only changed "like" to "+1" and added an option to share a feed item via Facebook or Google+ (i.e. changed the share function from "share within reader" to "share within G+/FB" my workflow would be further simplified, as I wouldn't need to click-through to the article and paste the link.

share|improve this answer

I've found Zite for iPhone/iPad very useful, especially when I accumulate more than 1K unread items in Google Reader. It gives you personalized magazine with topics you're interested in based on how you rate them, but the important thing is that it can use unread feeds from Google Reader as one of the sources.

EDIT: In December 2015 Zite was bought by Flipboard and ceased to exist as a separate software product. I never got into Flipboard though.

share|improve this answer

Try out offline readers like Instapaper or Pocket.
This helps in multiple ways:

  1. While reading the RSS feeds, you can have a quick decision on whether you want to read the whole article later at leisure, or do you think the summary itself is good enough for you to mark it as read.

  2. This allows you to work in two modes - the accumulation mode where you are just going through your reader feed. Almost like the GTD Inbox technique. The consumption mode is kept for later when you have time just to read things.

  3. Once you send it to an offline reader, you can then group the content in multiple ways. Either by subject, site, date etc. This allows you to read things at different times

  4. And yes - if you see that you are "adding more to read later" and keep accumulating content via the reader, you do have to make a conscious choice between collection and reading.

share|improve this answer

Use Twitter to follow people who tweet good links instead of subscribing to RSS feeds. You could use instapaper or just email yourself the link to read later if a link is interesting. Remember that You don't have to read everything. Important stuff will be mentioned by multiple sources and tend to come back more than once.

share|improve this answer

I have been using Good Noows for my personal use.. It has a list of popular RSS sorted by categories and you can select which RSS you want to view or not. You can also create your own categories. I have created "My feeds" and added some frequents websites I visit daily. It also allows you to view the content in various different layouts suitable for you. Plus it has integration with instapaper for readlater and keeps track of what you have been reading.

Try it out.

share|improve this answer

I use Yahoo Pipes to filter some feeds where only 1% of the content interests me (eg Job Boards) and group my feeds by category (or moods) in Google Reader. Then when the mood takes me I just browse through a category such as "Tech" with the scroll wheel and middle click articles that look interesting into other browser tabs. I'm essentially using Google Reader as a kind of "luck generator" to stumble on interesting things.

If an article is really interesting but too long to read right now I send it to Instapaper to read later.

I also prune feeds occasionally if I feel there are too many items in that feed without enough good content.

share|improve this answer

All these answers are workarounds but don't really adress the question that was posed. There's no real way to stop your RSS feeds from becoming a mess and there's no real way to stop information overload. Filtering tools slow this down but aren't enough. You can do your best to pare your feeds or followers but at the end of the day info overload is a symptom of overconsumption. We need tools that don't show us how many unread we have and filter down to what keeps me informed and healthy.

That's basically why I'm building Skim.Me ( To make your daily browsing routines more productive or at least FEEL more productive. We do all setup, organization and management work for your favorite site and app sources so you can browse no-reply emails, weather, news, social media, ecommerce, finance and more without leaving our web app in timed batches throughout the day.

As you browse we manage a “done” list for you that can be toggled to a “to-do” list for browsing that’s algorithmically controlled. It’s a great user experience that shows you what you’ve accomplished and never how many unread you have.

share|improve this answer
Product is dead (dec 2015)? In that case, please remove this answer. – Jan Doggen Dec 29 '15 at 12:11

There are many great answers, let me add yet another approach that help me keeping subscribed to 2,700 feeds without too much distractions reading.

A bit of philosophy.
First, you'll never read everything.
Secondly, feeds are different by their nature. For some of them, nothing happens if you miss any post (or all). Others are critical.
Third, in different times you may be in a mood to read about a certain topic: photography, I.T., humor, whatever.
And last but not least, you may have different amount of time for reading.

Let me expand a bit about the timing thing. Personally, I read news by various time slots: coffee break (5 minutes), lunch (30 minutes), or home reading (1-2 hours). I keep my feeds categorized in a way that helps me reading what I need at any given moment, considering how much time I can afford to spend.

Hence, your news feeds should be categorized by several dimensions:

  1. Importance;
  2. Subject;
  3. Author;

Importance is my favorite thing. I have 6 (yes, six) levels of priority and most times, I read my news feed by these groups, top-to-bottom. Just give them proper names like 01_Critical, 02_Important, 03_General, etc.
My Critical group contains 21 feeds and it contains only those feeds I never ever want to miss. They usually produce about 50 records a day, and it's possible to read them almost instantly.

Subject is pretty common thing, I've seen it everywhere, so nothing to talk too much.

Grouping by Author is also an important asset. It helps you quickly see if people from My_Family, Close_Friends, StackExchange_Members, Neighbors have posted anything. It does not mean you will read it immediately, but having the group name highlighted would give you a hint.

Don't worry if you spend some time arranging what categorization is best for you. It is very individual. But it will pay itself very soon.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.